Based solely on the movieone could imagine they were fearless in combat, ridiculously ripped, and dedicated to fighting against tyranny. But, did you know Spartans owned slaves?
Trying to justify slavery A number of arguments have been put forward to try and justify slavery. None of them would find much favour today, but at various times in history many people found some of these arguments entirely reasonable.
It's natural that some people are slaves This argument says that some people are slaves as part of the natural order of the universe, or as part of God's plan, and it is wrong to interfere with this by abolishing slavery - nobody nowadays regards slavery as a natural thing.
But if this argument was to be used then there would have to be some certain way of distinguishing natural slaves from those who should not be enslaved - without such a method injustice is sure to occur. No such test is possible, although past cultures thought there could be such tests.
Slaves are inferior beings This argument says that even if slavery is cruel and degrading, slaves are not fully human and so their suffering is as ethically important or unimportant as the suffering of domestic animals and they do not have any rights that would justify the abolition of slavery.
Some people take the argument further and say that slaves are beings who are so inferior that they deserve to be enslaved. This argument has often developed into racism to justify the enslavement of certain population groups - some of the defenders of the Atlantic slave trade argued that slavery was the proper place for people of African descent.
These arguments have been used in very recent times to justify enslaving particular racial groups. This group of arguments is nowadays regarded as completely misguided.
Slavery is good for slaves This argument teaches that slaves lack the ability to run their own lives and are therefore better-off and happier in a system where their lives are run by others. Modern society is unenthusiastic about such 'paternalistic' arguments. Slavery would be too difficult to abolish This probably is the reason why some cultures chose to tolerate slavery while trying to eradicate many of the more cruel practices - but it is not a justification for slavery.
Slaves are essential to certain industries A number of past industries have depended on slave labour, and the employers claimed that abolishing slavery would be economically disastrous. This argument isn't an ethical one and isn't backed up by examples.
There is also a strong counter-argument that the use of slave labour can force non-slave workers and businesses that don't use slavery out of business or into serious hardship.
Slavery is acceptable in this culture Slavery was generally accepted by the majority in some societies - if ethics is a matter of public opinion Cultural Ethical Relativism then some would say that slavery was ethically OK in those societies where it was the cultural norm.
This sort of argument is a key reason why many people oppose CER. Slavery is a useful form of punishment Some cultures have used enslavement as a punishment. Even if this were an acceptable argument, it would only cover a tiny fraction of cases and would not justify slavery in general.
Slavery is legal This is no argument at all - things can be legal and unethical at the same time. Abolishing slavery would threaten the structure of society This argument was popular at some periods - but it was perhaps an argument that a particular society was ethically flawed and needed reorganisation.
Since no modern society is based on slavery it has no application. Living in slavery is better than starving to death In circumstances of extreme poverty, living in slavery may be the least bad available option. While slavery may be the least bad option for an individual, this doesn't justify slavery, but indicates that action should be taken to provide other better options to individuals.
Free men should be able to become slaves if they want to It can be argued that this sort of slavery isn't real slavery until some form of coercion is involved. Since it would only apply to a tiny proportion of cases of 'slavery' it is not a justification for slavery itself.
By and large people aren't concerned about the ethics of voluntary slavery; what concerns them is the situation where people are forced to become slaves, or where people who have chosen to be slaves are prevented from regaining their freedom.
We also need to be alert to cases where people are conditioned to find slavery acceptable, and where it can be argued that their choice is not a free one. Finally, if free people choose to become slaves they may weaken the general prohibition against slavery, and this would be a bad thing.After escaping from slavery, Frederick Douglass published his own Narrative () to argue against slavery and for emancipation.
A great master of rhetoric, Douglass used traditional persuasive appeals to sway the audience into adopting his point of view.
Historical Parallel – Lincoln and Slavery. This situation was the root of Abraham Lincoln’s objection to slavery: while Lincoln came to abhor the institution for its own social ills, he and other members of the young Republican Party primarily opposed slavery because of its deleterious effect on the wages of free workingmen.
I would like to use this opportunity to explain this “reaction” image.
The gif itself is from the movie, Citizen Kane. Kane, self-made millionaire . Jan 31, · Slavery is good for slaves This argument teaches that slaves lack the ability to run their own lives and are therefore better-off and happier in a system where their lives are run by others. What do you know about Spartans?
Based solely on the movie (), one could imagine they were fearless in combat, ridiculously ripped, and dedicated to fighting against tyranny..
But, did you know Spartans owned slaves? Though much closer to being serfs, helots lived in constant fear for their lives and were obligated to farm the . Teacher’s Note. While under the Common Core Standards Cannibals All! qualifies as an informational text, it is first and foremost a passionately argued piece of persuasive writing.
Published in Richmond, Virginia, in , and aimed at both Northern and Southern readers, it sought to claim for the South the moral high ground in the increasingly fierce national debate over slavery.